Friday, October 28, 2005
Normative validity of lifeworld practices looks proximally the same as factical acceptance. The difference depends on the ability of the truly normative claim to work with validation processes when (inasmuch as) theyre required. People working pre-critically do much the same things as people working in ordinary life critically, because most unquestioned presumptions are established for (once-overtly) good reason, though the good reason is beyond ordinary understanding or has been forgotten.
Anyway, a theoretically valid practice is not the same as a theoretical practice! How to do things with words, for example, is not practically about linguistic analysis (and/or showing mastery of surrealizing narrativity).
Nonetheless, love of theory is something that fellow lovers best understand.
Sunday, October 16, 2005
The Yahoo! group Habermas address is, like any Internet address, part of an evolving Internet paradigm of interconnectivity. The group address expresses at least the Habermasian interest in that evolution, i.e., generally, a philosophical Human Interest or general human interest in discursive interconnectivity, especially that which contributes to [insert pithy synoptic of JHs project]which, by the way, is ultimately not a matter of JHs view of The Project (or research program) in which he participates as leading exemplar (while that fact is, of course, no license to ingenuinely misrepresent his difficult views, e.g., to create a straw man in order to have ones own view).