Richard Capobianco’s mystical sense of Heidegger

---

A 4-part reading of Richard Capobianco’s sense of Heidegger is available here. It’s a very close reading, such that by Part 4 my dialogue is sometimes phrase by phrase with RC’s text.

Within a few days, i hope, I’ll post a synthesis of themes from there, brought into some new contexts of Heidegger scholarship. But I’m unsure when that will be done, next week for certain, probably this weekend (by August 24). But I don’t know. This 4-part project was a break from other writing.

Anyway, I’ll note the new discussion here, at my Facebook/Heidegger page, and at my regularly updated home page. I might make this posting location the new discussion.

---

summer 2025

---

See the site home page for the current update.

---

“A note on thinking” appreciates Heidegger’s analysis of existence as prescient philosophy of action.

---

August 2 | “Let’s clear thinking” is another side trek into others’ mistaken senses of Heidegger, today about mistaking his concern for effective teaching
as being about himself; and about one influential scholar’s avoidance of Heidegger’s orientation toward real persons whom he is teaching.

Philosophy values de-congestion of thinking which may importantly (for a life) clear paths toward new insights.

---

spring 2025

---

“Prospecting generative consilience” is proximally an interplay of outerworldly and innerworldly appeals.

---

April 30 | Being meta-semiotic: “molecular texting.”

---

April 29 | So much can be said about thinking relative to a lived continuum of value domains. “Gardening better humanity” links to a letter emailed yesterday to an esteemed professor of political theory, then I added some comment. .

---

after the onto-theo-logical constitution of the Holocaust

---

The early 20th century mandarins of German academia unwittingly rational-
ized Catholic capitalism: the “onto-“ of pretentious German power.

Holy Roman Catholicism unwittingly rationalized antisemitism: the “-theo-.“
of scapegoating.

Catholic capitalism enabled Hitlerism which thereby afforded engineering of the Holocaust: the “-logical” scaling of psychotic murder.

The native culpability of Germans—portended in the dynamic of “refusal” which Heidegger framed in Contributions to Philosophy (c1938) and his framing of German ideology in his notebooks—was so horrifying to Germans after the war that decades would pass before their innocent children would grow up to demand that their parents’ generation face accountability, which appeared academically as the Historikerstreit.

winter 2025

---

Working with hundreds of pages of offline notes can become vertiginous.

Anyway, the past month’s discussions relative to Heidegger are a departure from giving any more attention to his presence for awhile. But up the road, there will be intensive work relative to lots to do and share online meanwhile.

---

Feb. 7 | “Cartesian vs. hermeneutical sensibility” addresses interest in why scholars continue to invalidly associate Heidegger with sympathy for nazism, but I don’t get into detail about surviving those times. “Becoming post-Heideggerian” overviews what I’m generally doing with Heidegger’s thinking.
I want to leave Heideggerian interests behind, much as I’m thankful for the influence. Though I would enjoy sharing a close reading of any of “his” texts-in-English, I have more than enough attraction to other engagements.

---